Execution

Your AI Assistant Doesn’t Need to Be Hacked to Leak Your Data.

Your AI Assistant Doesn’t Need to Be Hacked to Leak Your Data.

In short: AI assistants such as Copilot, ChatGPT and Claude can leak confidential data without being hacked, through prompt injection and over-broad access. Documented incidents show which controls actually close the gap. Your AI Assistant Doesn’t Need to Be Hacked to Leak Your Data. It Just Needs to Read the Wrong Email. by Denis Huré,  Managing

Your AI Assistant Doesn’t Need to Be Hacked to Leak Your Data. Read More »

Dyson’s £970 Million Warning

Dyson’s £970 Million Warning

In short: Dyson’s engineering is still exceptional, but an inconsistent after-sales experience is eroding the premium it charges for. The gap between promise and service deserves board-level attention. Dyson’s £970 Million Warning:Why Premium Engineering Cannot Outrun Poor Customer Service. by Denis Huré Dyson is not dying today. But it is moving in a dangerous direction:

Dyson’s £970 Million Warning Read More »

The Case for a Dedicated Chief AI Officer

The Case for a Dedicated Chief AI Officer

The paper argues for appointing a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) once artificial intelligence becomes strategic and impactful within organizations. It highlights the need for dedicated expertise in managing AI governance due to its complexity and rapid changes, asserting that executive attention is limited and current tech portfolios are overburdened.

The Case for a Dedicated Chief AI Officer Read More »

Who Really Decides Whether AI Wins or Fails?

Who Really Decides Whether AI Wins or Fails?

The key to successful AI implementation lies not in ownership by IT leaders but in strategic accountability by the CEO. AI reshapes business functions, requiring CEOs to decide on its transformative impact, while CTOs manage technical aspects, and CAIOs drive organizational change. Leadership is vital for real value realization rather than technical success alone.

Who Really Decides Whether AI Wins or Fails? Read More »

The Great AI Misunderstanding

The Great AI Misunderstanding

The article discusses treating AI not merely as software but as a transformative General-Purpose Technology. Key insights include the importance of redesigning systems around AI rather than just deploying tools. This strategic approach enables organizations to achieve significant economic benefits, emphasizing the need for complementary investments in processes, skills, and governance.

The Great AI Misunderstanding Read More »

Does AI Destroy Jobs

Does AI Destroy Jobs

The article discusses the complex relationship between AI and job displacement, challenging the narrative that AI solely destroys jobs. It reveals that while mass layoffs often attributed to AI may be strategic relabeling of workforce reductions, AI-driven transformations can also create new job categories in governance and technical roles, indicating a nuanced impact on employment.

Does AI Destroy Jobs Read More »

How to Define an AI Vision

How to Define an AI Vision

A sustainable AI vision begins with clear business objectives rather than specific technologies. Resilient CEOs must create adaptable, compliant systems that align with evolving AI models. Emphasizing governance and ethics, effective strategies focus on measurable outcomes and cultural change across organizations, ensuring flexibility as technology and regulations develop.

How to Define an AI Vision Read More »

The Truth Behing Agentic AI

The Truth Behind Agentic AI

Agentic AI represents a transformative evolution in automation, enabling autonomous digital agents that can plan, learn, and adapt rather than merely execute predetermined tasks. This shift compels CEOs to rethink management strategies, particularly in dynamic environments, emphasizing the need for governance and readiness alongside technological investment in agentic systems.

The Truth Behind Agentic AI Read More »